> From: Nitin Gupta [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:05 AM > To: Dan Magenheimer > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; [email protected]; Chris Mason; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Joel Becker; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected]; ocfs2- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Kurt Hackel; [email protected]; Dave Mccracken; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Konrad Wilk > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview > > On 07/23/2010 08:14 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > >> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[email protected]] > > > >> Also making the ops vector global is just a bad idea. > >> There is nothing making this sort of caching inherently global. > > > > I'm not sure I understand your point, but two very different > > users of cleancache have been provided, and more will be > > discussed at the MM summit next month. > > > > Do you have a suggestion on how to avoid a global ops > > vector while still serving the needs of both existing > > users? > > Maybe introduce cleancache_register(struct cleancache_ops *ops)? > This will allow making cleancache_ops non-global. No value add > but maybe that's cleaner?
Oh, OK, that seems reasonable. Dan _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
