Hi Andrew and Dan,

Thank for your efforts.
It is better than before.

Thanks a lot.
Gang


>>> 
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:27:23 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> We're hold "spin_lock(&ent->fs_fcheck->fc_lock)" so the allocation has
>> to be GFP_ATOMIC.
>> 
>> I changed the sizeof() because otherwise the line goes over the 80
>> character limit and also the new way is prefered kernel style.
>> 
>> Fixes: e467fe5da718 ('ocfs2: sysfile interfaces for online file check')
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/filecheck.c b/fs/ocfs2/filecheck.c
>> index 3332af1..9613663 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/filecheck.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/filecheck.c
>> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_filecheck_store(struct kobject 
> *kobj,
>>                      BUG_ON(!ocfs2_filecheck_erase_entry(ent));
>>              }
>>  
>> -            entry = kmalloc(sizeof(struct ocfs2_filecheck_entry), GFP_NOFS);
>> +            entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
>>              if (entry) {
>>                      entry->fe_ino = args.fa_ino;
>>                      entry->fe_type = args.fa_type;
> 
> GFP_NOFS is more reliable than GFP_ATOMIC, so we should retain that if
> possible.  And it's pretty easy to do here.
> 
> Gang, please carefully review and test?
> 
> 
> --- 
> a/fs/ocfs2/filecheck.c~ocfs2-sysfile-interfaces-for-online-file-check-fix-2
> +++ a/fs/ocfs2/filecheck.c
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_filecheck_store(str
>                               const char *buf, size_t count)
>  {
>       struct ocfs2_filecheck_args args;
> -     struct ocfs2_filecheck_entry *entry = NULL;
> +     struct ocfs2_filecheck_entry *entry;
>       struct ocfs2_filecheck_sysfs_entry *ent;
>       ssize_t ret = 0;
>  
> @@ -527,12 +527,19 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_filecheck_store(str
>               return (!ret ? count : ret);
>       }
>  
> +     entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_NOFS);
> +     if (!entry) {
> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
>       spin_lock(&ent->fs_fcheck->fc_lock);
>       if ((ent->fs_fcheck->fc_size >= ent->fs_fcheck->fc_max) &&
> -             (ent->fs_fcheck->fc_done == 0)) {
> -             mlog(ML_ERROR,
> -             "Online file check queue(%u) is full\n",
> -             ent->fs_fcheck->fc_max);
> +                     (ent->fs_fcheck->fc_done == 0)) {
> +             mlog(ML_ERROR, "Online file check queue(%u) is full\n",
> +                             ent->fs_fcheck->fc_max);
> +             kfree(entry);
> +             entry = NULL;
>               ret = -EBUSY;
>       } else {
>               if ((ent->fs_fcheck->fc_size >= ent->fs_fcheck->fc_max) &&
> @@ -544,26 +551,21 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_filecheck_store(str
>                       BUG_ON(!ocfs2_filecheck_erase_entry(ent));
>               }
>  
> -             entry = kmalloc(sizeof(struct ocfs2_filecheck_entry), GFP_NOFS);
> -             if (entry) {
> -                     entry->fe_ino = args.fa_ino;
> -                     entry->fe_type = args.fa_type;
> -                     entry->fe_done = 0;
> -                     entry->fe_status = OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INPROGRESS;
> -                     list_add_tail(&entry->fe_list,
> -                                     &ent->fs_fcheck->fc_head);
> -
> -                     ent->fs_fcheck->fc_size++;
> -                     ret = count;
> -             } else {
> -                     ret = -ENOMEM;
> -             }
> +             entry->fe_ino = args.fa_ino;
> +             entry->fe_type = args.fa_type;
> +             entry->fe_done = 0;
> +             entry->fe_status = OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INPROGRESS;
> +             list_add_tail(&entry->fe_list, &ent->fs_fcheck->fc_head);
> +
> +             ent->fs_fcheck->fc_size++;
> +             ret = count;
>       }
>       spin_unlock(&ent->fs_fcheck->fc_lock);
>  
>       if (entry)
>               ocfs2_filecheck_handle_entry(ent, entry);
>  
> +out:
>       ocfs2_filecheck_sysfs_put(ent);
>       return ret;
>  }
> _


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to