In ocfs2_orphan_del, currently it finds and deletes entry first, and then access orphan dir dinode. This will have a problem once ocfs2_journal_access_di fails. In this case, entry will be removed from orphan dir, but in deed the inode hasn't been deleted successfully. In other words, the file is missing but not actually deleted. So we should access orphan dinode first like unlink and rename.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph...@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiu...@huawei.com> --- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index 922eae9..816c667 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -2371,6 +2371,15 @@ int ocfs2_orphan_del(struct ocfs2_super *osb, (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(orphan_dir_inode)->ip_blkno, name, strlen(name)); + status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, + INODE_CACHE(orphan_dir_inode), + orphan_dir_bh, + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); + if (status < 0) { + mlog_errno(status); + goto leave; + } + /* find it's spot in the orphan directory */ status = ocfs2_find_entry(name, strlen(name), orphan_dir_inode, &lookup); @@ -2386,15 +2395,6 @@ int ocfs2_orphan_del(struct ocfs2_super *osb, goto leave; } - status = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, - INODE_CACHE(orphan_dir_inode), - orphan_dir_bh, - OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE); - if (status < 0) { - mlog_errno(status); - goto leave; - } - /* do the i_nlink dance! :) */ orphan_fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) orphan_dir_bh->b_data; if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) -- 1.8.4.3 _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel