On 02/02/2016 02:46 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We were getting build warning about:
> /fs/ocfs2/file.c: In function ‘ocfs2_file_write_iter’:
> fs/ocfs2/file.c:2198:1: warning: label ‘relock’ defined but not used
>
> The previous commit has cleaned up the code for direct io and removed
> the jump instruction to relock, but missed removing the label which is
> unused now.
>
> Fixes: 1a46f12e5071 ("ocfs2: code clean up for direct io")
> Cc: Ryan Ding <ryan.d...@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org>Reviewed-by: Ryan Ding<ryan.d...@oracle.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/file.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c > index 41c506e..c18ab45 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c > @@ -2195,7 +2195,6 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, > > inode_lock(inode); > > -relock: > /* > * Concurrent O_DIRECT writes are allowed with > * mount_option "coherency=buffered". _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
