Hi Gang,
May be. If so, it seems that it has relations with locks.
Can we know which data is newer?
Thanks,
Joseph
On 2016/4/21 15:59, Gang He wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> Sorry for delayed reply, the fsck log was reported from the customer.
> OCFS2 volumes to check are:
> /dev/dm-11 83886080 44540260 39345820 54% /sapmnt
> /dev/dm-14 62914560 15374960 47539600 25% /usr/sap
> /dev/dm-13 89128960 19976272 69152688 23%
> /usr/sap/trans
> uii316:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/dm-13
> fsck.ocfs2 1.8.2
> Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/dm-13:
> Label: <NONE>
> UUID: E35AF95C8114494391E0FFDEFD07309B
> Number of blocks: 22282240
> Block size: 4096
> Number of clusters: 22282240
> Cluster size: 4096
> Number of slots: 2
> /dev/dm-13 is clean. It will be checked after 20 additional mounts.
> uii316:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/dm-14
> fsck.ocfs2 1.8.2
> Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/dm-14:
> Label: <NONE>
> UUID: 43F2D9C8D70B47388527075F3C6C38BB
> Number of blocks: 15728640
> Block size: 4096
> Number of clusters: 15728640
> Cluster size: 4096
> Number of slots: 2
> /dev/dm-14 is clean. It will be checked after 20 additional mounts.
> uii316:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/dm-11
> fsck.ocfs2 1.8.2
> Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/dm-11:
> Label: <NONE>
> UUID: 0F1CBE6017934B5E8AD80149ED332659
> Number of blocks: 20971520
> Block size: 4096
> Number of clusters: 20971520
> Cluster size: 4096
> Number of slots: 2
> /dev/dm-11 is clean. It will be checked after 20 additional mounts.
>
>>From the log, it looks the file systems were not corrupted, this should be a
>>race-condition issue ?!
>
> Thanks
> Gang
>
>
>>>>
>> On 03/31/2016 10:56 AM, Gang He wrote:
>>> Hello Joseph and Junxiao,
>>>
>>> Did you encounter this issue in the past? I doubt this is possible a race
>> condition bug (rather than data inconsistency).
>> Never saw this. fsck report any corruption?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Junxiao.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Gang
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> Hello Guys,
>>>>
>>>> I got a bug, which reported a kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file,
>>>> Base on my initial analysis, this bug looks like a race condition problem.
>>>> Unfortunately, there was no kernel crash dump caught, just got some kernel
>>>> log as below,
>>>>
>>>> kernel BUG at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/ocfs2-1.6/default/ocfs2/file.c:466!
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831230] Supported: Yes
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831234]
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831238] Pid: 7134, comm: saposcol Not
>>>> tainted
>>>> 3.0.101-0.47.67-default #1
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 HP ProLiant BL460c G1
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831247] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0744b95>]
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [<ffffffffa0744b95>] ocfs2_truncate_file+0xa5/0x490
>>>> [ocfs2]
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831312] RSP: 0018:ffff880f39d79b68 EFLAGS:
>>>> 00010296
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831321] RAX: 000000000000008f RBX:
>>>> ffff880f39c5e240 RCX: 00000000000039fd
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831326] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI:
>>>> 0000000000000007 RDI: 0000000000000246
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831331] RBP: 1000000000000000 R08:
>>>> ffffffff81da0ac0 R09: 0000000000000000
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831336] R10: 0000000000000003 R11:
>>>> 00000000ffffffff R12: ffff880f3949bc78
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831342] R13: ffff880f39c5e888 R14:
>>>> ffff880f3d481000 R15: 00000000000e43bc
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831347] FS: 00007f11cda9d720(0000)
>>>> GS:ffff880fefd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831353] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
>>>> 0000000080050033
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831358] CR2: 00007f11cdad4000 CR3:
>>>> 0000000f39d35000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831363] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1:
>>>> 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831368] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6:
>>>> 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831374] Process saposcol (pid: 7134,
>>>> threadinfo ffff880f39d78000, task ffff880f39c5e240)
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831379] Stack:
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831383] 000000000002433c
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 00000000000e43bc
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 00000000000eab40
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 ffff880f00000001
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831397] ffff880f394956e0
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 ffff880f8e0d1000
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 ffff880f3949b800
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 0000000000000000
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831410] ffff880f39454980
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 0000000000000001
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 000000000002433c
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 0000000000000008
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831423] Call Trace:
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831492] [<ffffffffa074742e>]
>>>> ocfs2_setattr+0x26e/0xa90 [ocfs2]
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831522] [<ffffffff81178faf>]
>>>> notify_change+0x19f/0x2f0
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831534] [<ffffffff8115d517>]
>>>> do_truncate+0x57/0x80
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831544] [<ffffffff8116c053>]
>>>> do_last+0x603/0x800
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831551] [<ffffffff8116ceb9>]
>>>> path_openat+0xd9/0x420
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831558] [<ffffffff8116d33c>]
>>>> do_filp_open+0x4c/0xc0
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831566] [<ffffffff8115de5f>]
>>>> do_sys_open+0x17f/0x250
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831575] [<ffffffff8146e1f2>]
>>>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831588] [<00007f11ccb07080>] 0x7f11ccb0707f
>>>> Oct 21 13:02:19 uii316 [ 1766.831592] Code:
>>>>
>>>> The source code in question is as below,
>>>> 444 static int ocfs2_truncate_file(struct inode *inode,
>>>> 445 struct buffer_head *di_bh,
>>>> 446 u64 new_i_size)
>>>> 447 {
>>>> 448 int status = 0;
>>>> 449 struct ocfs2_dinode *fe = NULL;
>>>> 450 struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
>>>> 451
>>>> 452 /* We trust di_bh because it comes from ocfs2_inode_lock(),
>>>> which
>>>> 453 * already validated it */
>>>> 454 fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) di_bh->b_data;
>>>> 455
>>>> 456 trace_ocfs2_truncate_file((unsigned long
>>>> long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
>>>> 457 (unsigned long
>>>> long)le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size),
>>>> 458 (unsigned long long)new_i_size);
>>>> 459
>>>> 460 mlog_bug_on_msg(le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size) !=
>>>> i_size_read(inode),
>>
>>>> <<= here
>>>> 461 "Inode %llu, inode i_size = %lld != di "
>>>> 462 "i_size = %llu, i_flags = 0x%x\n",
>>>> 463 (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
>>>> 464 i_size_read(inode),
>>>> 465 (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size),
>>>> 466 le32_to_cpu(fe->i_flags));
>>>> 467
>>>>
>>>> If your encountered the similar issue in the past, please let me know, to
>>>> see if there is any patch/discussion for this bug.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>> Gang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
>>>> Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
>>>> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
>
> .
>
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
