On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:12:27 -0700 Ashish Samant <ashish.sam...@oracle.com> wrote:
> If we do fallocate with punch hole option on a reflink, with start offset > on a cluster boundary and end offset somewhere in another cluster, we > dont COW the first cluster starting at the start offset. But in this > case, we were wrongly passing this cluster to > ocfs2_zero_range_for_truncate() to zero out. > > Fix this by skipping this cluster in such a scenario. How serious is this bug? It sounds like a data-corrupting error? As such, this is a high priority fix and it should be backported into the -stable kernels? Please always include such info when fixing bugs. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
