Hello Alex,

Base on your bug description, I think that the fix should be OK.
But I suggest you to use more clear function name in this patch.
1) For new-added function ocfs2_get_block_lock(), I think that it is better if 
the function name is ocfs2_dio_rd_get_block().
2) Then, rename the original function ocfs2_dio_get_block() to 
ocfs2_dio_wr_get_block().
Why? 
Since this function looks to only be used by direct IO (read) mode, 
we should make the function name more clear, do NOT make other developer to 
misunderstand/misuse it in the future.

Thanks
Gang 


>>> 
> The ip_alloc_sem should be taken in ocfs2_get_block() when reading file
> in DIRECT mode to prevent concurrent access to extent tree with
> ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(), which may cause BUGON in
> ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache()->BUG_ON(v_cluster < le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos))
> 
> Fixes: c15471f79506 ("ocfs2: fix sparse file & data ordering issue in direct 
> io")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.c...@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piao...@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
> 
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> index 88a31e9..29607d9 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,19 @@ static int ocfs2_symlink_get_block(struct inode *inode, 
> sector_t iblock,
>       return err;
>  }
> 
> +static int ocfs2_get_block_lock(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> +                 struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
> +{
> +     int ret = 0;
> +     struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
> +
> +     down_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> +     ret = ocfs2_get_block(inode, iblock, bh_result, create);
> +     up_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int ocfs2_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>                   struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
>  {
> @@ -2154,12 +2167,9 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_get_block(struct inode *inode, 
> sector_t iblock,
>        * while file size will be changed.
>        */
>       if (pos + total_len <= i_size_read(inode)) {
> -             down_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> -             /* This is the fast path for re-write. */
> -             ret = ocfs2_get_block(inode, iblock, bh_result, create);
> -
> -             up_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> 
> +             /* This is the fast path for re-write. */
> +             ret = ocfs2_get_block_lock(inode, iblock, bh_result, create);
>               if (buffer_mapped(bh_result) &&
>                   !buffer_new(bh_result) &&
>                   ret == 0)
> @@ -2424,7 +2434,7 @@ static ssize_t ocfs2_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, 
> struct iov_iter *iter)
>               return 0;
> 
>       if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ)
> -             get_block = ocfs2_get_block;
> +             get_block = ocfs2_get_block_lock;
>       else
>               get_block = ocfs2_dio_get_block;
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.5.msysgit.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com 
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to