Hi, The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know.
Pattern Failed Passed Skipped Total DiscontigBgMultiNode 0 4 0 4 DiscontigBgSingleNode 0 5 0 5 MultipleNodes 0 9 1 10 SingleNode 0 18 1 19 Notes: - This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the time; - The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture. Cheers, Eric
single_run.log
Description: Binary data
multiple-run-x86_64-2017-11-06-19-57-44.log
Description: Binary data
=====================Discontiguous block group test starts: Mon Nov 6 21:24:07 CST 2017===================== <- Running test with 4096 bs and 32768 cs -> [*] Inodes Block Group Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Extent Block Group Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Inline File Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Xattr Block Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Refcount Block Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] =====================Discontiguous block group test ends: Tue Nov 7 01:35:29 CST 2017=====================
=====================Discontiguous block group test starts: Tue Nov 7 01:35:34 CST 2017===================== <- Running test with 4096 bs and 32768 cs -> [*] Multi-nodes Inodes Block Group Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Multi-nodes Extents Block Group Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Multi-nodes Xattr Block Group Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] [*] Multi-nodes Refcount Block Group Test:[80G[[1;32m PASS [0;39m] =====================Discontiguous block group test ends: Tue Nov 7 02:31:54 CST 2017=====================
_______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel