Hi all,
As far as we know, ocfs2/o2net is not a reliable message mechanism. 
Messages might get lost due to a sudden TCP socket connection shutdown. 
And the only customer of o2net is ocfs2/dlm, so this may cause ocfs2/dlm 
hang(missing AST and ASSERT MASTER). Sometimes it also causes 
ocfs2/dlm's infinite wait for accomplishment of DLM recovery. But that 
won't happen since target node is still heartbeating and no dlm recovery 
procedure will be launched.

So I think above cases drive us to improve current ocfs2/o2net making it 
more reliable. I already have a draft design for it. And we indeed need 
to change o2net behavior.

To accomplish this goal, we tag each o2net message with a sequence 
::msg_seq to let receiver tell if the newly coming message is a 
duplicated one or not and ::msg_seq will work as a key value for 
searching a following key structure in a red-black tree.

A brandy new structure is added to o2net named as *Message Holder*, it 
is responsible for _handle_status_ storing.

When TCP has to shutdown or reset due to unknown reason, although we 
lose the packets in send or receive buffer, o2net still manages those 
messages. This gives a chance to o2net to re-send the messages once TCP 
connection is established again.

Below diagram demonstrates how it works:

SEND                                    RECV
send message                            
tag message header with ::msg_seq       
                                        search for Message Holder with
                                          ::msg_seq
                                        NOT FOUND - insert one
                                        (FOUND - means a duplicated one)
                                        handle message
                                        store status into Message Holder
                                        send back status
instruct RECV to remove MH
                                        notify SEND that MH is already
                                          removed
return to caller

I am expecting your comments especially from @Mark, @Joseph and @Junxiao.

Thanks,
Changwei.

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to