On 12/27/2017 03:46 PM, Changwei Ge wrote:

> Hi Junxiao,
>
> On 2017/12/27 15:35, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> Hi Changwei,
>>
>> On 12/26/2017 05:20 PM, Changwei Ge wrote:
>>> Hi Alex
>>>
>>> On 2017/12/26 16:20, alex chen wrote:
>>>> Hi Changwei,
>>>>
>>>> On 2017/12/26 15:03, Changwei Ge wrote:
>>>>> The intention of this patch is to provide an option to ocfs2 users whether
>>>>> to allocate disk space while doing dio write.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether to make ocfs2 fall back to buffer io is up to ocfs2 users through
>>>>> toggling append-dio feature. It rather makes ocfs2 configurable and
>>>>> flexible.
>>>>>
>>>> It is too strange to make ocfs2 fall back to buffer io by toggling 
>>>> append-dio feature.
>>> It might be.
>>> But as my changelog said, I think, append-dio is key to whether to allocate
>>> space with dio writing. So filling hole and appending file should have the 
>>> same reflection.
>>>
>>> Besides, in the early days, ocfs2 truly falls back to buffer io when 
>>> append-dio is disabled and file hole is encountered.
>> I think we have discussed a lot in your v1 version. This wasn't fit for
>> mainline, you can keep one off-mainline patch.
> Fine. I agree now.
> I give up trying to push this patch into mainline.
> BTW, could you please help review my another patch (ocfs2: try to reuse 
> extent block in dealloc without meta_alloc) which is used to fix a dio crash 
> issue?
> So without this patch, dio still won't hit such an issue.
> Your comments are very important to me.
Sure,  will look at it.

Thanks,
Junxiao.
>
> Thanks,
> Changwei
>
>> Thanks,
>> Junxiao.
>>
>


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to