For Andrew's convenience, resend this patch
Current code assume that ::w_unwritten_list always has only one item on.
This is not right and hard to get understood.
So improve how to count unwritten item.
Reported-by: John Lightsey <j...@nixnuts.net>
Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
index 88a31e9..77ec9b4 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
@@ -784,6 +784,7 @@ struct ocfs2_write_ctxt {
struct ocfs2_cached_dealloc_ctxt w_dealloc;
struct list_head w_unwritten_list;
+ unsigned int w_unwritten_count;
};
void ocfs2_unlock_and_free_pages(struct page **pages, int num_pages)
@@ -1373,6 +1374,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unwritten_check(struct inode *inode,
desc->c_clear_unwritten = 0;
list_add_tail(&new->ue_ip_node, &oi->ip_unwritten_list);
list_add_tail(&new->ue_node, &wc->w_unwritten_list);
+ wc->w_unwritten_count++;
new = NULL;
unlock:
spin_unlock(&oi->ip_lock);
@@ -2246,7 +2248,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_get_block(struct inode *inode,
sector_t iblock,
ue->ue_phys = desc->c_phys;
list_splice_tail_init(&wc->w_unwritten_list,
&dwc->dw_zero_list);
- dwc->dw_zero_count++;
+ dwc->dw_zero_count += wc->w_unwritten_count;
}
ret = ocfs2_write_end_nolock(inode->i_mapping, pos, len, len, wc);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
