Hi changwei,

On 2018/2/23 15:30, ge.chang...@h3c.com wrote:
> From: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
This line seems unnecessary, others looks good to me.

thanks,
Jun
> 
> Obviously, the comment before dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() has
> nothing to do with it. So remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> index ec8f758..65f0c54 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> @@ -2331,13 +2331,6 @@ static void dlm_free_dead_locks(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>       __dlm_dirty_lockres(dlm, res);
>  }
>  
> -/* if this node is the recovery master, and there are no
> - * locks for a given lockres owned by this node that are in
> - * either PR or EX mode, zero out the lvb before requesting.
> - *
> - */
> -
> -
>  static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node)
>  {
>       struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
> 

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to