Hi Larry,
It would be better for you to paste the compilation warning and gcc version.
So we can justify if it is deserved to be fixed.
Thanks,
Changwei
On 2018/5/7 11:06 AM, Larry Chen wrote:
> Hi Jun
>
> Yeah,I know your logic is right.
> It's just a compile warning that made me feel uncomfortable.
>
> :)
>
>
>
> On 05/07/2018 08:52 AM, piaojun wrote:
>> Hi Larry,
>>
>> 'had_lock' will be initialized by ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(), and the
>> 'bail' branch above won't use it either as 'inode_locked' is still zero.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Jun
>>
>> On 2018/5/6 17:49, Larry Chen wrote:
>>> The variable had_lock might be used uninitialized.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Larry Chen <lc...@suse.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> index 6ee94bc23f5b..50f17f56db36 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
>>> @@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr
>>> *attr)
>>> handle_t *handle = NULL;
>>> struct dquot *transfer_to[MAXQUOTAS] = { };
>>> int qtype;
>>> - int had_lock;
>>> + int had_lock = 0;
>>> struct ocfs2_lock_holder oh;
>>>
>>> trace_ocfs2_setattr(inode, dentry,
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-devel mailing list
> Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
