Hi!

Is there a solution to the panic that occurs on SLES9 and OCFS2? I had just 
setup OCFS2 and ASM on a SAN. I was installing clusterware from Node 1 and 
Node 2 started the panic situation. The clusterware install could not 
resolve the network nodes for the private IP at the time.

Regards
Amin Adatia ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
KnowTech Solutions Inc. (www.knowtech.ca)
(613) 226-8378  Mobile (613) 864-8378
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:00 PM
Subject: Ocfs2-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 3


> Send Ocfs2-users mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ocfs2-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. OCFS2 wih RH Linux 4 and Oracle 9i RAC (Shivaprasad Kambalimath)
>   2. Re: OCFS2 wih RH Linux 4 and Oracle 9i RAC (Sunil Mushran)
>   3. OCFS for Solaris (Lowe_CNTR, Larry E.)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:42:17 -0700
> From: "Shivaprasad Kambalimath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 wih RH Linux 4 and Oracle 9i RAC
> To: <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I understand Oracle 10gV2 RAC got certified recently with OCFS2. Any
> idea when Oracle 9i RAC certification is planned with OCFS2?
>
>
>
> We are running Oracle EBS with 9i RAC on Linux 3 with OCFS1 and planning
> to upgrade to 10gV2 on Linux 4 with OCFS2.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shiva
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20060503/f5b9949b/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 11:56:09 -0700
> From: Sunil Mushran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 wih RH Linux 4 and Oracle 9i RAC
> To: Shivaprasad Kambalimath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> on-going.
>
> Shivaprasad Kambalimath wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I understand Oracle 10gV2 RAC got certified recently with OCFS2. Any
>> idea when Oracle 9i RAC certification is planned with OCFS2?
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running Oracle EBS with 9i RAC on Linux 3 with OCFS1 and
>> planning to upgrade to 10gV2 on Linux 4 with OCFS2.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Shiva
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ocfs2-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:37:37 -0400
> From: "Lowe_CNTR, Larry E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS for Solaris
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Any word on when OCFS for Solaris will be coming out?
>
> Larry
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20060504/1a02663d/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ocfs2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
>
>
> End of Ocfs2-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 3
> ******************************************
> 

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to