I run 2 OCFSv2 clusters on SLES9 SP3 (last update) on x86_64, and never saw something like OOM.
Through, when I tested it under a heavy load (I run it on a light load now, putting heavy load onto traditional ReiserFS and heartbeat cluster), I noticed extreme CPU usage of the OCFS2 (but never saw memory usage). (But SLES9 have improved OCFS2 drivers, as I know. Anyway, lOCFSv2 in the last SLES9 update looks pretty stable. I never installed OCFS2 from sources to keep system consistant, and it shows some results). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michał Wilkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:36 AM Subject: [Ocfs2-users] out of memory problem concerning 64-bits? > Hello, > we are currently running in production the system based on Redhat > Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3, ver. 32-bits. We are periodically > encountering an OOM-killer problem. Problem was discussed in previous posts. > > I have a question: does it concern only 32-bits systems or 64-bits as well? > On 32-bits system OCFS2 driver consumes Low Memory (only ~900 MB) and > therefore causes oom-kills. What about 64-bits systems? Does it consume > all memory available for system (in my case: 8 GB) and therefore it > takes much longer to encounter oom-kills? > > It is a very important issue for me and a response would be greatly > appreciated. > > Regards > Michal Wilkowski > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users > _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
