Absolutely. 100% agree! I think that the only sugnificant (and easy, safe) improvement for o2cb which should be done is _multiple IP for heartbeat_ and _configurable timeout_.
> ... Personally, I think it's a huge ease-of-use win for someone > who just wants to set up a tandem web server (for example) with ocfs2 > mounted between the servers. o2cb is extremely easy to set up, so going > from 0 to 100% is literally a 3 minute operation. > > So, I think we should keep o2cb around for the truly simple deployments. > We don't really need to expand it much, it's already suited for that. > Long term development, AFAIK, will focus more on getting the userspace > cluster interface more solid. Like any kernel<->userspace interaction > involving file systems, it could find itself prone to memory deadlocks > if the system is very low on memory and swaps out the cluster manager. > That's something that definitely needs to be worked on, and I'm working > with Andrew to ensure that happens in the future. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
