Sunil Mushran wrote: > None of what you have written allows you to use our resources to > spread your opinions as official recommendation.
I don't think he said that oracle doesn't recommend that solution. What about your resources? Are ext3 and heartbeat your resources? I want to hear Alexi's opinion as well as yours Sunil. RCR > Alexei_Roudnev wrote: >> Yes, you distribute and support OCFSv2; but Oracle is another story, >> and the >> common recommendation >> from many different Oracle engineers (not related to OCFSv2) is >> _don't use >> OCFS for RAC files /OCRFile and CSSFile/_. Which I fully agree - it >> don't >> have any benefits but a lot of headache. Using OCFSv2 for backups or >> archive >> logs is another story, for example. >> >> Oracle itself have not a SINGLE opinion (to be curious, I hear a strong >> recommendation against OCFSv2 from oracle support, which I can not agree >> with), so we can't treat your recommendations as official as well - >> you are >> interested in OCFSv2 while users are not (users are interested in >> making our >> data centers run smoothly). The only _official_ thing is _certification >> matrix_. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
