That's fine. The only limitation is how the file is updated.
In 1.2, one cannot create a shared writeable mmap. But one
is free to use write() and have shared readonly mmaps.
Patch to address shared writeable mmap has been checked into
mainline. It will be available in 2.6.23 and with ocfs2 1.4.

Luis Freitas wrote:
Anyone have coments on the shared mmap? What could happen if a file is mmaped by say, 3000 different processes in a 4 node cluster, and someone went there and changed its contents? This is a possible situation on a large production APPS environment, or any forms based application. Regards,
Luis

*/Alexei_Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:

    It's really a good question. We should know _which exactly
    combinations are used internally_. (OS, File System, NAS/SAN).
In reality therse particular combinations are most stable and
    preffered ones - no matter what is _officially certified_.
        ----- Original Message -----
        *From:* Luis Freitas <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ;
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2007 6:46 PM
        *Subject:* Re: [Ocfs2-users] Urgent :: 11i on OCFS2.. I mean
        APPL_TOP,COMMON_TOP etc..

        Prabhakar,
This post is only my personal opinion. I do not work for
        Oracle nor have any close contact with the support and
        development groups. But I never heard of anyone using this
        combination.
This is kind of a gray area, since Oracle usually
        provides support for OCFS2 in conjunction with RAC database.
        The APPS people is a different group internally at Oracle, so
        even if this is officially supported you could get into
        situations where the support analysts start to redirect the
        TAR between these groups, or could argue that since the issues
        are not related to Oracle Database or Oracle database binaries
        they would not fix it.
I would not do it unless with a very large customer that
        could escalate any issues to get a fast resolution with
        support. It probably is better to get a NAS storage and map it
        using NFS.
That said since it is supported for the database binaries,
        there should not be immediate problems with other files. The
        FAQ about shared APPL_TOP on metalink says that any disk
        sharing technology can be used.
One thing that comes to my attention is that Oracle Forms
        uses memory mapped files extensively. I dont know how
        completelly this is implemented on OCFS2 and if it works
        well.  Anyone can comment on this? There are some posts on
        this list about problems with shared mmap.
Regards,
        Luis


        */[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:

            All,

            Is Shared APPL_TOP certified with 11i on OCFS2? Please
            send me the information as soon as possible..

            We have two RAC nodes on ASM file system and one middle
            tier right now. Now want to setup Shared APPL_TOP so need
            your help whether this is a certied with OCFS2 or not.

            OS is SUSE 9 SP3.

            Regards,
            Prabhakar Tammina.
            (614)598-3487(cell).


            _______________________________________________
            Ocfs2-users mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users


        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Got a little couch potato?
        Check out fun summer activities for kids.
        
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48248/*http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz>

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        _______________________________________________
        Ocfs2-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48516/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7%20> and lay it on us.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to