On 10/11/07 3:28 PM, "Sunil Mushran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> How is this a fs problem? > > Ulf Zimmermann wrote: >> We don't and when we were investigating why we had on the ProCurve >> 4108gl reassembly problems, we were specific asked if we are doing >> bonding or VLAN tagging (neither we were doing). Just looks like the >> ProCurve are loosing packets without telling so. We switched in Cisco >> 2960G-48 with Jumbo Frames now and haven't had any reassembly timeouts >> since then. Global Cache timeout has gone down significant. Each >> Interconnect for Oracle 10G has its own Cisco 2960G-48 now. I'd say if the cluster is otherwise healthy but the FS dies, that is a FS problem. A single point of failure is a single point of failure. -- Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97370 Office: Valley Library #4657 _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
