Note of caution. FWIW It is not recommended to mount OCFS2 volumes via
NFS.Sean N. Gray Luis Freitas wrote: What I mean is that they have the full TCP/IP stack in them, and provide a SCSI interface to the kernel, so there is no additional CPU load using them.One could instead of using a iSCSI adapter, use a common etherned adapter and mount the iSCSI target using a software driver. The main CPU would have the additional load of disassembling the TCP/IP packets and routing them. Btw, I never actually used one of these boards. Regards, Luis --- On Fri, 12/19/08, David Coulson <[email protected]> wrote:From: David Coulson <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] hardware needed for OCFS To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Date: Friday, December 19, 2008, 10:26 AM Typically I find folks use 'NAS" to refer to filesystem level sharing (NFS, Samba), and SAN for block level (FC, iSCSI). There are plenty of iSCSI HBAs (I've only used the ones from qlogic), however they don't 'simulate' anything - They're just a SCSI adapter with an iSCSI backend. Luis Freitas wrote: |
_______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
