OTN has a forum for ASM. Please post this qs on that forum. On Feb 7, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Karim Alkhayer <kkha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All, > > > > Are there any benchmarks with respect to performance with respect to > ASM over OCFS2 vs. standard locally managed tablespaces? > > In our environment, data files hosting tables/lobs are stored on a > RAID6 disk array with 10K rpm disks, whilst indices are stored on a > different RAID6 disk array with 15K rpm disks. > > We’re using oracle managed files for the rollback/undo and temporary > tablespaces. > > Would ASM over OCFS2 be smart enough to detect the fast LUNs? > > > > Appreciate your thoughts. > > > > Best regards, > > Karim > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-users mailing list > Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
