Hi Aravind, Aravind Divakaran wrote: > Hi Tao, > >> Hi Aravind, >> >> Aravind Divakaran wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I have already sent one mail regarding the space issue i am facing with >>> my >>> ocfs filesystem. As mentioned in the below link it is an issue related >>> to >>> free space fragmentation. >>> >>> http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1189 >>> >>> I have seen a patch for stealing extent allocation which was there is >>> 2.6.34-rc1 kernel. So i compiled my new kernel and installed on my >>> system. >>> >>> Below is my ocfs details on my system >>> >>> #modinfo ocfs2 >>> >>> filename: /lib/modules/2.6.34-rc1/kernel/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.ko >>> license: GPL >>> author: Oracle >>> version: 1.5.0 >>> description: OCFS2 1.5.0 >>> srcversion: A8B69947E8FF56D74858993 >>> depends: jbd2,ocfs2_stackglue,quota_tree,ocfs2_nodemanager >>> vermagic: 2.6.34-rc1 SMP mod_unload modversions >>> >>> This is my stat_sysdir.sh output >>> >>> http://pastebin.com/RZH9DkTk >>> >>> Can anyone help me how to resolve this, please as the problem occurs on >>> production mail server with 3000 emailid. >> I just checked your stat_sysdir output. It isn't caused by extent block >> alloc actually. So the patch doesn't work for you. Yes, the problem you >> meet is fragmentation issue, but the root cause is that inode_alloc >> can't allocate any more inodes(a little different from 1189). >> >> I am now working on discontiguous block group. It will resolve your >> issue I think. Hope it can be get into mainline in 2.6.35. >> >> Regards, >> Tao >> > > For my previous mail i got reply from you > > "Another way is that you can cp the file to another volume, remove it and > then cp back. It should be contiguous enough." > > As mentioned in the 1189 > > "However, reducing the slot count by 1 (to 4) may not be enough as it does > not > have much contiguous space. It may work. But reducing it by 2 will > definitely work. > > Umount the volume on all nodes and run: > # tunefs.ocfs2 -N 3 /dev/sda1 > > Run fsck.ocfs2 for sanity checking." > > Will anyone of the above solution will temporary solve my problem. Yes, it works. I just replied you in another e-mail.
Regards, Tao _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
