Cory- is it appropriate to say that the fix will not be backported to
the 2.6.16.60.x.x kernels for 10-sp3?
- Angelo
{via mobile device}
On Jun 2, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Coly Li <coly...@suse.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2010 08:19 PM, Tao Ma Wrote:
>> Add Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.com> and Coly Li <coly...@suse.de> to
>> cc
>> since they know what
>> ocfs2 kernel version SUSE uses.
>> Angelo McComis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/06/10 22:34, Sunil Mushran wrote:
>>>>> The kernel is old. We fixed this issue in 2.6.30. We have also
>>> backported
>>>>> it to the 1.4 production tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem was that the inodes being created did not have
>>> locality
>>>>> leading to a directory having inodes that were spaced far apart
>>> from
>>>>> each other. The one place where it really affected performance
>>> was "rm".
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for reply!
>>>
>>>
>>> I've seen this rm problem in the production version of SLES 10.3
>>> +updates.
>>>
>>> Is this fix available in the SLES Enterprise kernels yet? 10.3.x or
>>> 11.1.x (11.1 officially releases today, btw).
>>>
>
> I guess you meant SLES10 SP3 and SLES11 SP1. For SLES11 SP1, the
> kernel is 2.6.32 based, the fix Sunil mentioned (which
> was included in 2.6.30) should be in SLES11 SP1 kernel.
>
> --
> Coly Li
> SuSE Labs
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
