So that's appears to be ok. How about a strace.

strace -o /tmp/fsck.out fsck.ocfs2 /dev/mapper/360...


On 04/08/2011 10:24 AM, Mauro Parra wrote:
> debugfs.ocfs2 -R "ls -l //" 
> /dev/mapper/360a98000572d434e4e6f6335524b396f_part1
>       514             drwxr-xr-x   6     0     0            4096 18-Feb-2011 
> 14:03 .
>       514             drwxr-xr-x   6     0     0            4096 18-Feb-2011 
> 14:03 ..
>       515             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 bad_blocks
>       516             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         2097152
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 global_inode_alloc
>       517             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         1048576
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 slot_map
>       518             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         1048576
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 heartbeat
>       519             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0    549761056768
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 global_bitmap
>       520             drwxr-xr-x   2     0     0            4096
> 14-Mar-2011 13:02 orphan_dir:0000
>       521             drwxr-xr-x   2     0     0            4096
> 4-Apr-2011 16:15 orphan_dir:0001
>       522             drwxr-xr-x   2     0     0            4096
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 orphan_dir:0002
>       523             drwxr-xr-x   2     0     0            4096
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 orphan_dir:0003
>       524             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         4194304
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 extent_alloc:0000
>       525             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         4194304
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 extent_alloc:0001
>       526             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 extent_alloc:0002
>       527             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 extent_alloc:0003
>       528             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         4194304
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 inode_alloc:0000
>       529             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0         4194304
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 inode_alloc:0001
>       530             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 inode_alloc:0002
>       531             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 inode_alloc:0003
>       533             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0        33554432
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 journal:0001
>       534             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0        33554432
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 journal:0002
>       535             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0        33554432
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 journal:0003
>       537             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 local_alloc:0001
>       538             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 local_alloc:0002
>       539             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 local_alloc:0003
>       540             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 truncate_log:0000
>       541             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 truncate_log:0001
>       542             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 truncate_log:0002
>       543             -rw-r--r--   1     0     0               0
> 18-Feb-2011 14:03 truncate_log:0003
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Sunil Mushran<sunil.mush...@oracle.com>  
> wrote:
>> On 04/08/2011 09:25 AM, Mauro Parra wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I'm getting this error:
>>>
>>> $fsck.ocfs2  /dev/mapper/360a98000572d434e4e6f6335524b396f_part1
>>> fsck.ocfs2: File not found by ocfs2_lookup while locking down the cluster
>>>
>>> Any idea or hint?
>> This means it failed to lookup the journal in the system directory.
>>
>> What does the following show?
>> # debugfs.ocfs2 -R "ls -l //" /dev/mapper/...
>>
>>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to