On 06/08/2011 03:36 PM, Herman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using:  RHEL 6 / DRBD 8.3.10-2 kmod from ElRepo / OCFS2 compiled from
> Redhat's kernel source 2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.x86_64
>
> I have a system running DRBD with OCFS2.  The OCFS2 filesystem is not
> being used for databases.  I had a split-brain due to
> RHEL6's /etc/init.d/iptables script.  Immediately after the split-brain
> the OCFS2 filesystem started giving errors and they came in pretty fast.
> I recovered from the split-brain manually, but that didn't stop the
> messages.  Rebooting, switching primary nodes, fsck.ocfs2, all didn't
> work... the messages still came in fast.  I finally had to find out what
> that inode was pointing to and remove it before the messages stopped.
>
> > From looking through the archives, I guess it's due to there being a
> hole in the inode from the sparse filesystem?  But I don't know why it's
> complaining about it, and I don't know why fsck.ocfs2 couldn't fix it.
>
> Here's the errors I got:
> Apr 18 07:53:07 server-2 kernel: (8163,0):ocfs2_read_virt_blocks:853
> ERROR: Inode #5377026 contains a hole at offset 466944
> Apr 18 07:53:07 server-2 kernel: (8163,0):ocfs2_read_dir_block:533
> ERROR: status = -5
> Apr 18 07:53:08 server-2 kernel: (8163,12):ocfs2_read_virt_blocks:853
> ERROR: Inode #5377026 contains a hole at offset 466944
> Apr 18 07:53:08 server-2 kernel: (8163,12):ocfs2_read_dir_block:533
> ERROR: status = -5
> Apr 18 07:53:08 server-2 kernel: (8508,0):ocfs2_read_virt_blocks:853
> ERROR: Inode #5377026 contains a hole at offset 466944
> Apr 18 07:53:08 server-2 kernel: (8508,0):

The directory cannot have holes. That's the error. I am assuming
that triggered due to the network/drbd. If so, atleast one should
be ok.

fsck should detect the problem. Don't know offhand whether we
have a fix code for it or not. First time seeing this issue.

File a bug on oss.oracle.com/bugzilla.

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to