On 09/21/2011 12:37 PM, Herman L wrote: >>> On 09/19/2011 08:35 AM, Herman L wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Got a couple of these messages recently, but I don't know what they mean. >>> Can anyone let me know if I need to panic? I'm using OCFS2 compiled from >>> the kernel source of RHEL 6.0's 2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.x86_64. >>> >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.222240] >>> (10387,12):dlm_lockres_release:507 ERROR: Resource >>> W0000000000000001b027d69b591f15 not on the Tracking list >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398194] lockres: >>> W0000000000000001b027d69b591f1, owner=1, state=0 >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398195] last used: 8197071325, >>> refcnt: 0, on purge list: no >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398197] on dirty list: no, on >>> reco list: no, migrating pending: no >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398198] inflight locks: 0, asts >>> reserved: 0 >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398199] refmap nodes: [ ], >>> inflight=0 >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398200] granted queue: >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398200] converting queue: >>> Sep 19 08:07:15 server-1 kernel: [3892420.398201] blocked queue: >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Herman >> From: Sunil Mushran >> To: Herman L >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:57 PM >> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] dlm_lockres_release:507 ERROR: Resource >> W0000000000000001b027d69b591f15 not on the Tracking list >> >> I've no idea of the state of the source that you are using. The message >> is a warning indicating a race. While it probably did not affect the >> functioning, >> there is no guarantee that that would be the case the next time around. >> >> The closest relevant patch is over 2 years old. >> http://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=smushran/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b0d4f817ba5de8adb875ace594554a96d7737710 > Thanks Sunil for responding. I know you can't easily support my setup, but > anyways I checked the sources. > > Looks like the patch you mention is in the sources I compiled from ( RHEL6.0 > kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.src.rpm ), so I guess the source of the problem is > elsewhere. > > The fs/ocfs2 directory from the RHEL6 sources I compiled from is almost > exactly the same as the mainline 2.6.32 kernel, except > 1) It looks like they implemented the changes in aops.c from the "cleanup > blockdev_direct_IO locking" patch that's in 2.6.33. > 2) In journal.c, they rename ocfs2_commit_trigger to ocfs2_frozen_trigger, > which seems to be from 2.6.35. > 3) In cluster/masklog.c they add a "const" to the mlog_attr_ops declaration > 4) And in quota.h, they are missing "#define QFMT_OCFS2 3" > > Not sure if that helps any, but thanks in any case!
All those changes are ok. And unrelated. This is a new one. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
