On 31 May 2012 14:25, Nick Anderson <n...@cmdln.org> wrote: > Hakan, your script just ran me out of inodes, maybe you already had a > fragmented file-system to start from and it triggered it faster. Probably we had a smaller file system compared to yours. I can't remember anymore unfortunately but probably the original file system was less than a couple of hundreds of GB, if that, more likely tens of GB (in 2009 it would have been 146GB SCSI or SAS disks with RAID1 or RAID10). In the end we worked around it by putting various directories with very large number of small files into separate mount points. This way even if we hit the issue, it wouldn't be the end of the world. We have followed that route with other ocfs2 deployments and haven't had a problem with anyone yet.
_______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
