Pravin,

With that database version you do not need the datavolume option in 1.4 or 1.6.

Thanks,
Herbert.

On 10/31/12 3:16 PM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
yes, we use OCFS2 to store Oracle database files and Oracle database version is 11.2.0.2 and we are upgrading it to 11.2.0.3 before we are ready to switch from OCFS2 1.4 to 1.6

Regards,
Pravin

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Pravin,

    Are you using OCFS2 to store Oracle database files?  What database
    version do you use?

    Thanks,
    Herbert.


    On 10/31/12 11:45 AM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
    Just attaching the guide which is by Sunil, refer to page 43 and
    it says to use the datavolume option but the man page of
    mount.ocfs2 says that its depricated parameter. below is details
    form man page of mount .ocfs2

    datavolume

    This mount option has been deprecated. It has been used in the
    past, to force  the  Oracle RDBMS  to

    issue direct  IOs  to  the  hosted  data files, control files,
    redo logs, archive logs, voting disk,

    cluster registry, etc. It has been deprecated because it is no
    longer required.  Oracle  RDBMS users

    should instead use the init.ora parameter, filesystemio_options,
    to enable direct IOs.


    Just want to be cautious of what we use.

    Regards,
    Pravin

    On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Herbert van den Bergh
    <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com
    <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

        Yes, I'm pretty sure that should be fine.


        On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Pravin K Patil
        <pravinkpa...@gmail.com <mailto:pravinkpa...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        thanks for quick response, so does this mean, we can even
        remove that option on current 1.4 OCFS2 and prepare new host
        also without this option and we swing the storage and we
        should be fine?

        Regards,
        Pravin

        On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Herbert van den Bergh
        <herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com
        <mailto:herbert.van.den.be...@oracle.com>> wrote:

            The datavolume option didn't really do much.  It just
            changed the filesystem identifier from OCFS2 to OCFS V1,
            so some programs which shall not be named would detect
            it as OCFS and do something special. Those programs have
            long since been fixed.  And there's absolutely no other
            functional behavior change with or without the parameter.

            Thanks,
            Herbert.


            On 10/30/12 8:08 AM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
            Hi All,

            While building new servers, we just noticed that on new
            servers which are SLES11 SP2 and OCFS2 1.6 there is no
            option for mount as datavolume
            All our file system which have oracle data files are
            mounted with this option in current system which is
            SLES10 SP4 and OCFS 1.4

            So when we swing the storage, we will have to be
            careful of this mount option. Any suggestions?

            Regards,
            Pravin

            On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Pravin K Patil
            <pravinkpa...@gmail.com
            <mailto:pravinkpa...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                Thanks a lot for all the responses, I will reply
                back with practical experience in few weeks.

                Pravin


                On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Tiger Yang
                <tiger.y...@oracle.com
                <mailto:tiger.y...@oracle.com>> wrote:

                    1.6 could recoginze 1.4 format, but after
                    moving to the new server,  maybe need enable
                    new features which only supported by 1.6 via
                    tunefs.ocfs2.

                    Thanks,
                    Tiger


                    On 10/26/2012 01:19 AM, Pravin K Patil wrote:
                    Hi,

                    We have current Oracle RAC running with OCFS2
                    1.4.2 on SLES10 SP4 servers.
                    we are building new RAC nodes with SLES11 SP2
                    which will have OCFS2 1.6

                    We plan to just represent the storage from
                    current HW to new HW and expect the new server
                    to recognize all FS and let Oracle start RAC
                    instances.

                    Are there any steps required after/before
                    presenting the storage to new server.

                    Regards,
                    Pravin


                    _______________________________________________
                    Ocfs2-users mailing list
                    Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com  
<mailto:Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com>
                    https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users





            _______________________________________________
            Ocfs2-users mailing list
            Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com  <mailto:Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com>
            https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users






_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to