I don't think so. I haven't ever encountered this. So I am wandering if these volumes are not newly created. In other words, they are copied using LUN copy. Another possibility is, they are the same device with different name in multipath environment.
Thanks, Joseph On 2016/5/4 13:43, Eric Ren wrote: > Hello, > > As email subject tell, I encountered this weird problem. I got this from > customer: > > # /sbin/mounted.ocfs2 -d > Device Stack Cluster UUID > /dev/sdb pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdal pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdau pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdbd pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdbv pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdce pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdcw pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/sdcn pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > /dev/mapper/3600507640081010d5000000000000082 pcmk pacemaker > 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D > > I'm surprised several different ocfs2 volumes have the same UUID, and DLM use > disk UUID as lockspace's name which means they share same lockspace! > > Did you ever see this? Is it possible for different volumes share same > lockspace? why? > > Thanks in advance! > Eric > > . > _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users