I don't think so.
I haven't ever encountered this. So I am wandering if these volumes are
not newly created. In other words, they are copied using LUN copy.
Another possibility is, they are the same device with different name in
multipath environment.

Thanks,
Joseph

On 2016/5/4 13:43, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> As email subject tell, I encountered this weird problem. I got this from 
> customer:
> 
> # /sbin/mounted.ocfs2 -d
> Device     Stack  Cluster   UUID
> /dev/sdb                                       pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdal                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdau                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdbd                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdbv                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdce                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdcw                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/sdcn                                      pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> /dev/mapper/3600507640081010d5000000000000082  pcmk   pacemaker 
> 032F55597DEA4A61AB065568F964174D
> 
> I'm surprised several different ocfs2 volumes have the same UUID, and DLM use 
> disk UUID as lockspace's name which means they share same lockspace!
> 
> Did you ever see this? Is it possible for different volumes share same 
> lockspace? why?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> Eric
> 
> .
> 



_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users

Reply via email to