Hi All I have upload one of the main function "hough.cc" I found out one of the main reason for slow speed is that when I add a item to the link list I add it to the end of the list, I already change the way to adding new items which is adding new item to the beginning of the link list. now the speed is much more faster, however there are many other segmentation fault in the code, I was wondering is there another other way for C debugging that I can use instead of just using fprintf(), it will be better if I can found out which line the segmentation fault has occur rather then just get an error message of "Segmentation fault (core dumped)".
I didn't upload all the code, as I think no one will want to read them all lol Regards, Leo On Sep 10, 5:18 pm, Shag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it will be easier to suggest something if you pasted some code > here . > Cheers, > Shantanu > > On Sep 8, 4:44 pm, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All > > > I just finish convert my hough transform code from Lua to C, and I try > > to call this new function from Lua > > however it seems it run even slower than when its implemented in Lua. > > I been using some fprintf() function in C for debugging segmentation > > fault, could the slow speed cause by this function? Other than that I > > have no clue why it perform slower than lua, as I convert the code > > from Lua into C and most procedure remain the same other than minor > > change in the data structure. > > any suggestion will be appreciated. > > > Cheers, > > Leo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
