Got it. OK, thanks, Tom. Bill
On Jun 19, 11:22 am, Thomas Breuel <[email protected]> wrote: > OCRopus is distributed under Apache 2, and there is nothing putative about > it. > > If you link OCRopus with libgsl, then the resulting binary can only be > distributed and used under the GPLv3, and that my impose restrictions on you > how you can redistribute OCRopus source code. Since we don't distribute > binaries, that doesn't affect us and doesn't affect the license under which > you receive OCRopus source code from us. (Of course, IANAL.) > > In any case, libgsl is not essential for OCRopus and we'll probably remove > the dependency soon anyway. > > Tom > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 18:52, Bill Janssen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Building ocropus-0.4 yesterday, I notice that it fails if "gsl" is not > > available. I presume that this is the GNU Scientific Library, which > > is licensed under GPLv3. Does this make ocropus also GPLv3, despite > > the putative Apache license? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
