David Bateman wrote: > Jonathan Stickel wrote: >> Yes, I think dlmread should move into core octave. Might as well move >> csvread into core octave also since it is just a wrapper to dlmread. >> There still exists another dlmread m-file in octave-forge. Unless >> there is a good reason not to, I think it should be deleted. > I believe its better to keep octave-forge aligned with the Octave 3.0.x > tree at the moment and dlmread/dlmwrite/csvread if they are included in > Octave would go on the 3.1.x branch. Therefore, the two versions should > coexist for a while longer.. >
OK, it is fine to wait until Octave 3.1 to move them over. Can I delete octave-forge/main/io/inst/dlmread.m ? Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
