søn, 09 03 2008 kl. 04:42 -0700, skrev dbateman: > Søren Hauberg wrote: > > > > Should we make an effort to simplify these files? > > > > Sure we should, the goal at the time was to make sure we made no mistakes > and cut out too much. I see no reason not to simplify these.... Once we > start supporting 3.0.x and 3.1.x there might be some issues, though I > suggest we stick to support for 3.0.x only at the moment, and switch to > supporting 3.1.x only just before a testing/stable release of 3.1.x I've simplified the 'configure.base' and 'Makeconf.in' in the 'image' and 'symbolic' packages. All I've done is removed a bunch of checks that seemed to be related to checking for 'mkoctfile'. This simplifies things quite a bit, and still work for me. Could somebody else check that the changes haven't screwed up anything? If they are good, I can start changing the auto* files in the rest of the packages.
Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
