Florent Angly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delay... At the moment, I'm not finished with the
> inverse parabolic implementation. However, I can submit a little fix
> that prevents the function to break if the upper bound of the search
> interval is the same as the upper bound (attached file). This makes
> the function behave just like its Matlab counterpart.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Florent
Florent,

Could you send your changes as a patch rather than the complete code..
Sending the complete function makes it very difficult to see what in
fact you have altered. Use "svn diff" to create this if you are using
the SVN tree, or just "diff -u" with a local of the original function if
you aren't.

Also I don't think we've added an account for you, so when you send the
code as a patch, please supply your sourceforge username.

Regards
David

-- 
David Bateman                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to