man, 06 10 2008 kl. 16:05 +0100, skrev Carlo de Falco:
> So if I understand, if your suggestion is accepted then your functions  
> would
> have to be included into octave itself rather yhen OF?

Not quite, but some of the functions would. Specifically, 'makeinfo',
'get_help_text', and 'get_first_help_sentence' are needed to use my
implementation of the help system. So, some functions
('generate_package_html', 'get_html_options', and 'html_help_text')
should still be in OF. This is the reason I'm keeping the package out of
OF -- otherwise I'm afraid things will easily get very confusing.

> in this case I would suggest to have the HTML pages be built  
> automatically by pkg.m
> at the time each package is installed or rebuilt so that an user could  
> have a local hypertext
> with a list of installed packages and links to their html ovrview and  
> function help pages,
> what do you think?

Well, I think that would be very useful. Especially, if 'doc' was
changed to launch a web browser instead of an info viewer. This is the
kind of thinking that makes me think it would be great if the help
system could be rewritten as m-files, as it's much easier to implement
such features.

Søren


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to