Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > Do we? In fact, I think the Fortran standard requires the default > REAL, INTEGER and LOGICAL to be of equal size (numeric storage unit). > So, only some combinations of these flags are conforming in general. I > do not think Octave needs to be bulletproof in this regard, at least > not until a real need arises from practice. When you're altering the > sizes of default types, you're often breaking standard-conformance, > and you're therefore supposed to know what you're doing. Anyway, a > common practical advice is to avoid LOGICALs in external interfaces at > all and just use INTEGERs. > > cheers > >
Then the pgf90 compiler with the -i8 flag is not standards compliant. Given that, then yes just using octave_idx_type is the right thing D. -- David Bateman dbate...@dbateman.org 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
