On 20 Jul 2009, at 15:00, Thomas Weber wrote: > The reality is that most small packages are maintained by nobody. > That's > the reason why they stay small.
I don't object reorganizing orphaned functions in a way that is more easy to maintain, I just don't think it is a good idea to put together in one package many functions that are different in scope. >> In case it is to much of a hussle to have a deb package for each >> octave >> package, maybe you could have debs containing more than one octave >> package? > > That's not possible, unless i fork octave-forge. I can't arbitrarily > create new source packages (well, I can, but then that's a fork, isn't > it). I don't know, I am not familiar enuogh with the debian packaging system to judge here... > Anyway, I won't insist on this proposal. > > Thomas c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
