tor, 04 03 2010 kl. 09:32 +0000, skrev Neil Lawrence: > I guess it might make sense longer term to plug into the netlib > implementation by Cody: this does seem to be used as a standard. > However, there may be all sorts of difficult knock on effects from > that!
The problem with Netlib (from what I understand) is that the license situation often is quite unclear. When looking at Cody's code, I couldn't find any license, which is always a bad sign. For now, I've commited my m-file implementation to the 'specfun' package. When Octave 3.4 is released it will come with Jaroslav's implementation in the core, and then I'll remove the m-file from the package. > I'll let you know if I come up with any issues. Great! Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
