2010/5/23 Thomas Weber <twe...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > I'm currently faced with a bug report against ocs in Debian (basically, > the PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL file assume they are in the same directory as all > the directories containing the .m files) > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582750 > > Before I spend time trying to work-around this: is there a reason that > ocs contains 6 directories for its 21 .m files? I mean, moving them into > one directory would mean one PKG_ADD file less to parse for Octave > at startup and 6 directories less to stat at startup. And ~20 files in a > directory seems manageable to me. > > Any objections to moving these files into just one directory?
YES, I do object. Please DO NOT change the directory structure of OCS. ocs is not the only package containig subdirectories, why do you see this problem only for ocs? why is wrong to assume that PKG_ADD be in the directory above the code directories? > Thanks > Thomas > c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
