Martin,

I agree with your comments. If the numbers are wrong there should be a
proper response and correction. This is why I sent an e-mail to the
author. Lets see how they react.

JPi


On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Martin Helm <mar...@mhelm.de> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 4. September 2010, 18:50:40 schrieb Martin Helm:
>>  (but I am of course not a community representative but a private
>> person who is concerned about incorrect benchmarks and will ask that not
>> on behalf my own).
> Sorry a typo:
> This last part should of course be:
> "not on behalf the community but on my own"
>
> - Martin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
>



-- 
M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
-----
PhD Student
University of Zürich
www.ailab.ch/carbajal

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to