tor, 12 08 2010 kl. 00:37 +0100, skrev Carnë Draug: > I just added a new function to the image package to calculate the > morphological gradient of a image. I called it mmgradm for > compatibility with code that used the SDC morphology toolbox. I only > made a small change to the syntax that if only SE is defined, it's use > in both erosion and dilation. > > Is it okay to place it there under that name? Should it be changed to > imgrad for similarity with the other morphological operators in the > image package?
I think this name is fine. > I understand it's a ridiculously simple function but I hope somebody > else finds it useful. Many (most?) functions in Octave are really simple; the thing is that when you write code you don't always realise that things wore so simple. So, I don't think simplicity is a bad thing :-) Thanks for the addition to the package, Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
