ons, 22 12 2010 kl. 00:02 +0100, skrev Philip Nienhuis:
> Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I just committed a few patches that allows me to compile the 'java'
> > package with Octave 3.3.54+ as well as 3.2.4. I can do simple stuff like
> >
> > msgbox ("Hello")
> >
> > so the package appears to work for me with 3.3.54+. Can other people
> > verify this?
>
> That's great Søren, thank you - did you make a configure option to
> select getcwd() (3.2.4) or get_current_directory() (3.3.52+)?
Yes. I actually do a version check, so it's not perfect. It should work,
though.
> Do the following work:
> javaclasspath.m
> javamem
> If they do I suppose the rest of the java pkg works OK, too.
Yeah, they work just fine.
> Another issue (or actually an earlier issue): the argument order in
> javaMethod() was reversed compared to the competition (while ironically
> this function was added for the sake of ML compatibility in the first
> place). I don't know if this has been corrected in svn either.
I don't know if this has been fixed. I'd rather not attempt to fix this
as I don't really use this package (this sounds like stuff that should
be fixed by somebody who actually know what they are doing).
Søren
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of
Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even
within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps:
an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your
browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
