Hi, Thanks for the quick reply! On 29 Jun 2011, at 08:59, Olaf Till wrote:
> Please wait a minute. > > In SVN some days ago I had already removed any usage of "cell2cell" in > the optim package, including leasqr (replaced it by num2cell). And > your example with leasqr works for me. OK, I will hold any changes then. Could you please check-in your versio of optim to the SVN? the current version of leasqr is totally unusable to me, even just "demo leasqr" fails and erases the contents of the global workspace > So there is no need to increase > the version number for the dependency on "miscellaneous" (actually I > had _decreased_ this number some days ago, there is only a dependency > now due to some older code using a different scheme for option > handling). As for increasing the packages version numbers (i.e. of > miscellaneous), I had already increased it in SVN directly after the > last release, and think we should keep this new number until after the > next release. I was proposing to bump the version numbers only to make sure the right dependencies were loaded, if you removed use of cell2cell from leasqr, this is no longer needed. > The remaining point is cell2cell and your patch. Since I wrote > cell2cell (I left in miscellaneous since it can't be replaced by > num2cell in every case (but actually it can be replaced by mat2cell > with some effort)), I'd like to look at this issue first. Please wait > a few minutes till I'm ready. no hurry ;) > Olaf c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
