tor, 08 09 2011 kl. 20:12 -0500, skrev Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso: > Fine, I say we let Octave-Forge packages go in the non-GNU part of > Savannah. We won't enforce GNU coding standards on them, nor any > particular free license as long as it's GPL compatible. We can keep > using svn because people are more comfortable with it. But at least > bring them closer to Octave.
Carnë summarised my opinions nicely, so I won't repeat them. It seems to me that *if* a move to Savannah should happen then it should better thought-through; right now it seems like the plan is to move and see what happens; I'm not convinced that this is a good strategy. Another issue is lack of manpower. At least I do not have the resources to make things like this happen. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the threat from malware and how it can impact your online business. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427462/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
