2011/9/16 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[email protected]>:
> 2011/9/16 Juan Pablo Carbajal <[email protected]>:
>> 1. Is it ok if I keep the name "multinomExp" for the function or is
>> there a naming convention in octave (I like camelCase)?
>
> Almost no Octave functions use CamelCase or camelCase. Certainly none
> in core do. Matlab sometimes does this (e.g. onCleanUp), particularly
> for some classes (obvious Java influence), but to me it looks jarring
> in Octave.
>
> I don't really care (well, I do, but not enough to keep arguing about
> it). Use whatever you like.
>
>> 2. How shall I do with the copyright notice? I add you to the
>> copyright? I replace any instance of my name by yours? Do you have
>> your own copyright text?
>
> Uhm. WTFPL? Sure, put my name there if you wish.
>
> I wanted to take a look at your other functions too. Maybe I'll do
> that later.
>
> - Jordi G. H.
>

Hi Jordi,

Good, then I will change all names to underscores.

The function you submitted is a completely new creation, it has no
resemblance to the one I submitted, except for the output ;). I will
properly add your name, would be unfair otherwise.

Cheers,



-- 
M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
-----
PhD Student
University of Zürich
http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry&reg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to