man, 31 10 2011 kl. 04:03 +0000, skrev Carnë Draug:
> 2011/4/14 Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com>:
> > I noticed that for both the functions imdilate and imerode there's
> > also a dilate and erode function. They aim to do the same thing so I
> > was wondering if they should be merged. The differences between them,
> > at least that I can see, is that dilate and erode are only good for
> > binary images (they go as far as binarizing them if a non logical
> > matrix is supplied) while imdilate and imerode are also good for
> > grayscale images (and use the same method as dilate and erode if
> > binary images are supplied). Also, dilate and erode have a
> > non-documented option where the operation is done a number of times
> > rather than just once.
> >
> > I think it would be good to merge them. I'd propose to keep the names
> > imdilate and imerode for compatibility with the image processing
> > toolbox of MatLab and the fact they do both kinds of operations
> > (binary and greyscale).
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I was following one of the bugs in imdilate that was fixed with the
> 3.4 release when I remembered this. Instead of removing them, I made
> them issue a warning about being deprecated and we can remove them
> later.

Matlab has both 'erode' and 'imerode' (likewise for 'dilate'). OR have
they been deprecated from Matlab?

> Also, I removed imginfo since it was marked as deprecated for more than 2 
> years.

Makes sense.

Søren


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook 
in minutes. BlackBerry App World&#153; now supports Android&#153; Apps 
for the BlackBerry&reg; PlayBook&#153;. Discover just how easy and simple 
it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to