On 2 November 2011 02:31, Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 November 2011 19:09, Joaquín Ignacio Aramendía <samsa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> A new patch for that function.
>>
>> - Corrected a logic error, added a compatibility f=str2funct(f) at the
>> beggining of the file.
>>
>> - Changed function behavior to work with vectorized functions (improve
>> speed on loops).
>>
>> - Added some documentation.
>
> In the help text you mention both a var @var{x} and @var{x0}. When you
> mention @var{x}, you actually mean @var{x0}?
>
> Your patch pretty much changes every line of the actual derivation. It
> seems that all it changes is the capitalization of the x0 variable. Is
> this correct?
Plus, your patch didn't close the new if block with str2func (and so,
the code was non-functional).
Carnë
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA® Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
