Hi last year I implemented an extra argument to the imtophat function to perform a black/closing top-hat transform on the image (by default it performs white/opening top-hat transform. This was the only name I knew and saw for them, in the image processing books and wikipedia. However, matlab seems to have imbothat (which performs the black/closing alternative). Goggling for bottom hat transform does show a few hits about this nomenclature.
Anyway, I added this extra function and made the extra option imtophat use it. My question is: should we remove this extra option from imtophat (leave a warning for some time saying to use imbothat first) so that if in the future matlab adds a different extra option, we won't break anyone's code? Note that the extra option for imtophat was only released on April this year (so if we remove it, the sooner the better) and I already added a note to the imtophat help text that imbothat performs the black/closing top-hat transform. Carnë ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA® Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
