On 11/26/2011 01:13 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hi everyone > > I'd like to announce to the whole community that we will be removing > the non-free section from the octave-forge project. For more than one > week, members gave their opinion and it appears that we all agree on > this point. For future reference, here's the link for the thread where > it was discussed > http://gnu-octave-repository.2306053.n4.nabble.com/future-of-non-free-in-octave-forge-td4081264.html > > I'll soon be contacting the maintainers of the packages in non-free > and related libraries on the hope that they'll host the packages > themselves or maybe make them free software. I'll also be rejecting > the submission of the octMOSEK package.
I maintain the FreeBSD ports for octave-forge. I want to know whether I should delete the octave-forge-spline-gsvspl port. (I never created an octave-forge-gpc port.) I am not in a hurry to do this, and I could just wait until the spline-gsvspl disappears from your web site. But if someone decides to host it on a different web site, it would be good to pick that up instead. Thanks, Stephen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
