On 28 Mar 2012, at 22:00, Philip Nienhuis wrote: >> I might be confused by the name but I think archprefix was intended to point >> to the directory with the architecture dependent files rather than just the >> package subdir ... >> that is handled by the files >> >> scripts/pkg/private/getarchdir.m >> scripts/pkg/private/getarch.m >> scripts/pkg/private/getarchprefix.m > > Are these accessible for ordinary users/scripts as they reside in ./private > folder?
No, they are not. If you really think they are needed elsewhere we can move them. But if possible I'd try to work using pkg as the common interface rather than adding separate functions. > BTW I haven't got them in my ./3.6.1/m/pkg folder. Are they newer than 3.6.1? They where still subfunctions of pkg.m at the time of the 3.6.1 release. pkg.m had a lot of subfunctions, they have been moved out to the /private folder whith this changeset: http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/cfb0173fe1ca?revcount=120 as discussed in this thread: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-cleaning-up-pkg-m-tp4472636p4472636.html Work on pkg.m is going on in the "default" branch so I think it will only be released with 3.8. c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
